Pages

Friday, December 6, 2013

JOBS

WDR 2013 on Jobs—Main Parts and Messages



Part I: Jobs are transformational. We tend to neglect jobs when thinking about growth, while in reality they are at the center of development. Jobs connect improvements in living standards, productivity gains and social cohesion.
Part II: What is a “good job”? Some jobs do more for economic and social development than others, because they reduce poverty and inequality, strengthen value chains and production clusters, or help build trust and shared values.
Part III: Policies through the jobs lens. Understanding how labor markets interact with government and market imperfections, and how this interaction affects development goals, is the key to identifying and evaluating policies for the creation of good jobs.



Summary of Part I

Living standards. Growth in labor earnings leads to improvements in households’ material and subjective well-being. But growth in earnings cannot be taken for granted and who gets those earnings matters.
Productivity. Job creation, destruction and reallocation may matter more in developing countries, where the dispersion of labor productivity is wide. Some jobs lead to sizeable productive externalities.
Social cohesion. Employment status is correlated with trust and with civic engagement, which suggests a possible impact of jobs on social cohesion. But some jobs may have a greater impact on cohesion than others.




Summary of Part II
Good jobs. They are usually seen from an individual angle (earnings and benefits), often from an aspirational point of view. But from a development perspective they are those contributing the most to long-term societal goals.
Diverse jobs agendas. Countries differ in the set of job-creation possibilities realistically available to them at a particular point in time; they often differ in their societal goals too. Jobs agendas are thus country- and context-specific.
Interconnected jobs agendas. Global jobs agendas address global welfare goals, but their roll-out can only be country-specific. The global migration of jobs and workers creates opportunities to improve well-being on a global scale, but it also raises the specter of a global fight for jobs.



Summary of Part III
The jobs lens. Because of market and government imperfections, the social value of a job can be different from the earnings associated with it. The social value also depends on societal preferences. Making the wedges between individual and social values explicit can guide policy choices.
Policy evaluation. Those wedges may be difficult to quantify, but understanding their source is important to understand where the obstacles to the creation of good jobs lie, and to assess the costs and benefits of policies aimed at removing those obstacles.
The difficult questions. The jobs lens allows rigorous analysis of some of the most controversial issues policy makers around the world are confronting. The answers crucially depend on the balance between market and government imperfections.

Summary of Part II
Good jobs. They are usually seen from an individual angle (earnings and benefits), often from an aspirational point of view. But from a development perspective they are those contributing the most to long-term societal goals.
Diverse jobs agendas. Countries differ in the set of job-creation possibilities realistically available to them at a particular point in time; they often differ in their societal goals too. Jobs agendas are thus country- and context-specific.
Interconnected jobs agendas. Global jobs agendas address global welfare goals, but their roll-out can only be country-specific. The global migration of jobs and workers creates opportunities to improve well-being on a global scale, but it also raises the specter of a global fight for jobs.



Summary of Part III
The jobs lens. Because of market and government imperfections, the social value of a job can be different from the earnings associated with it. The social value also depends on societal preferences. Making the wedges between individual and social values explicit can guide policy choices.
Policy evaluation. Those wedges may be difficult to quantify, but understanding their source is important to understand where the obstacles to the creation of good jobs lie, and to assess the costs and benefits of policies aimed at removing those obstacles.
The difficult questions. The jobs lens allows rigorous analysis of some of the most controversial issues policy makers around the world are confronting. The answers crucially depend on the balance between market and government imperfections.

No comments:

Post a Comment